Technical SEO agency

Technical SEO Services for SaaS

A page can look perfect in a browser and still be hard for Google and AI systems to fetch, render and understand. We find those problems, write the tickets your developers can ship, and check the fix is live.

What buyers see
What a crawler gets
Empty HTML
Server-rendered
Raw vs rendered HTML

Trusted by fast-growing SaaS and AI companies

Pixara logoMarkaz logoMaqsad logoHatching Dragons logoCapture logoBlink logoPixara logoMarkaz logoMaqsad logoHatching Dragons logoCapture logoBlink logo
What we find

The problems are rarely exotic. They are hidden by the stack.

Most of what holds SaaS sites back is basic findability and rendering, buried under a modern framework, several subdomains and a fast release cycle.

Content that only exists after JavaScript runs

The raw HTML is nearly empty, or key links are missing until the page renders.

Staging, login and app pages in the index

Empty states, auth screens and test environments compete with your real pages.

Subdomains that disagree with each other

Marketing site, app, docs and help centre with different canonicals, sitemaps, analytics and links.

Duplicate URLs from facets and parameters

Filters, tracking parameters and programmatic templates create thin copies.

Sitemaps full of redirects and 404s

The file meant to guide crawlers points them at pages that do not count.

Releases that change things without an SEO check

A redesign quietly changes URLs, metadata, status codes or internal links.

AI crawlers blocked at the CDN or firewall

The site works for people while the crawlers that could cite it get a 403.

AI
crawler
403
200 OK
The block we found on our own site
AI crawler access

Our own site was blocking ChatGPT

Our host’s firewall was returning errors to ChatGPT’s crawler. The site worked for every visitor, and robots.txt allowed the bot, but the request was stopped before it reached the page. We found it by checking the crawler’s path, the firewall rules and the server response, not by trusting robots.txt.

On every engagement we check, on every host:

  • robots.txt and meta robots on every host
  • Canonicals and XML sitemaps
  • Raw HTML against rendered HTML
  • Response codes
  • CDN, WAF and bot-management rules
  • Server logs

Access is the first requirement, not a promise of citations. Those also depend on clarity, authority, consistent brand information and evidence across the web.

How we audit

Four stages, in this order

Most SaaS sites get the majority of their technical upside from the first two. Performance matters, but rarely first.

1FindabilityVery high
2UnderstandingHigh
3PerformanceMedium
4ScaleGrows with size
Fix in this order
1

Findability

Can the right pages be reached and indexed? Search Console Page Indexing and URL Inspection, a crawl with Screaming Frog or Sitebulb, robots.txt and sitemaps on every host, canonicals, redirects, status codes, noindex, staging and app leakage.

2

Understanding

Can search engines and AI systems tell what each page is about? Raw against rendered HTML, JavaScript-generated content and links, information architecture, internal links and structured data on the templates that matter.

3

Performance

Are the important templates fast and stable? PageSpeed Insights, Lighthouse, Core Web Vitals data and browser checks on the homepage, pricing, product and key landing pages. No chasing a perfect score while a page is blocked from indexing.

4

Scale

Will it hold up as the site grows? Programmatic pages, international versions, large docs sites, faceted navigation, release process and migration risk, using analytics and server or CDN data where available.

TierTypical SaaS issuesImpactUsual effort
1. FindabilityAccidental noindex or robots blocks, AI crawlers blocked at the CDN, JS-only content, broken canonicals, app or staging pages indexed, sitemaps full of redirects and 404sVery highLow to medium
2. UnderstandingWeak internal linking to money pages, orphaned posts, duplicate templates, missing or wrong structured data, soft 404s in single-page appsHighMedium
3. PerformanceHeavy JS bundles, layout shift from embeds and chat widgets, slow LCP on hero imagesMediumMedium to high
4. ScaleProgrammatic page quality, international and hreflang, crawl efficiency, release QA, log-file monitoringMedium (high for large sites)Medium to high
What you get

A fix list developers can actually ship

Not a long automated audit. Every item on the list carries:

EvidenceImpactEffortOwnerAcceptance criteria

We write tickets in Jira, Linear or whatever your team uses. We make agreed SEO-level changes ourselves, and for application code, CDN or deployment changes we work alongside your engineers: answering questions, reviewing the fix and QA-ing the live release.

Not useful“Improve JavaScript SEO.”
UsefulWhich template is affected, what raw and rendered HTML show, which signal is wrong, what the change should produce, and how we will verify it after deployment.
SEO-142 · Integration pages hide links from crawlers
Template/integrations/[slug]
EvidenceLinks missing from raw HTML
ChangeRender links server-side
Accept whenURL Inspection shows links
QA passed
Tickets developers can ship
Frameworks

JavaScript is not the problem. What the crawler receives is.

We work across the stacks SaaS teams use. We do not recommend a rebuild just because a site uses JavaScript.

We check server-side rendering or static generation, metadata handling, canonical tags, routing, status codes, hydration, internal links and whether important copy exists in the initial HTML. We also look for soft 404s: pages that work in the browser but return an ambiguous response to a crawler.

SSR and static generationStatus codes and soft 404sCopy in the initial HTMLHydration and routing

We focus on URL structure, metadata, canonicals, redirects, sitemap behaviour, structured data, page templates and the limits of the platform's rendering or CMS setup, plus whether the marketing site, app and docs platform tell different versions of the same story.

URL structure and redirectsSitemap behaviourCMS template limitsSite, app and docs consistency
Site migrations

A migration is an SEO release project

Not a redirect spreadsheet delivered after the new site goes live. The two mistakes we see most: bringing SEO in after the DNS switch, and redirecting every old URL to the homepage. A redirect should lead to the closest useful replacement; where none exists, a genuine 404 or 410 can be the right answer.

/features/crm
/product/crm/
/blog/2021/guide
/guides/setup/
/pricing-old
/pricing/
/old-page
→ homepage
Closest match, never the homepage
Before launch

Inventory old URLs and map each to its closest destination. Review the new architecture, staging access, canonicals and hreflang, templates, sitemaps, and a redirect and QA plan. Compare old and new versions of important pages.

At launch

Test representative URL groups, not just the homepage: redirects, status codes, canonical targets, robots rules, sitemaps, analytics, Search Console verification, rendering and internal links.

After launch

Monitor crawl errors, indexed pages, rankings, organic landing pages and conversions, and fix issues while the evidence is fresh.

“Schema and llms.txt are supporting infrastructure, not a citation strategy by themselves. We implement them where they improve machine understanding, then combine them with technical accessibility, useful content, authoritative mentions and citation tracking.”

Results

Technical foundations, measured in pipeline

For a B2B SaaS client in the AI cold-calling category, monthly trials grew from about 150 to more than 300 in three months. That came from technical and AI-search foundations combined with commercial pages and conversion work, not from one technical fix. Over the wider 18-month programme the site went from no organic visibility to more than 15,000 monthly organic clicks.

150 → 300+monthly trials in three monthsAI cold-calling assistant (B2B SaaS)
0 → 15Kmonthly organic clicks, 250+ keywords in the top threeSame client, 18 months
150Kmonthly organic visitsMarkaz →

“Usman is not only incredibly detail-oriented but also deeply technical, a rare combination in the world of marketing.”

Zohaib Akmal
Zohaib AkmalFounder, Tekrowe

We cleaned crawl and indexation signals, strengthened templates and internal links, added structured data where it was useful, and made sure the site could be retrieved by both traditional and AI crawlers. Those are the bottlenecks that stop valuable pages from counting.

Usman Tauqir
Usman TauqirFounder & CEO
Scope

What we do, and what we don’t

We do

  • Diagnose problems with evidence
  • Write developer-ready tickets
  • Make agreed SEO-level changes: content, metadata, internal links, some schema
  • Review proposed fixes and QA releases
  • Work with your engineers or recommend an implementation partner for rebuilds

We don’t

  • Hosting or general web development
  • Unrestricted ownership of your production infrastructure
  • Guaranteed rankings or guaranteed AI citations
  • Full rebuilds when template fixes will do
  • Doorway pages, thin mass-produced content or link schemes
  • Treating a Lighthouse score or an llms.txt file as the goal
Pricing

Technical SEO pricing

Starting ranges, not fixed quotes. Site size, number of hosts, JavaScript complexity, international versions, release frequency and implementation support all change the workload.

One-off$2,500–$10,000

Technical SEO audit: a prioritised fix list with evidence, owners and acceptance criteria.

Ongoing$1,500–$5,000/mo

Technical support for teams that release often, run programmatic pages or several subdomains.

Full programmeFrom $3,500/mo

Every Pipeline plan includes technical SEO alongside content, AI search, authority and reporting.

See the Pipeline plans →

Migrations, replatforms and large international or multi-host projects are scoped separately.

Choosing an agency

10 questions to ask any technical SEO agency

Which JavaScript frameworks and CMSs have you worked on?

Next.js, Nuxt, Webflow, headless WordPress, docs platforms.

How do you check rendering?

Look for a raw against rendered HTML comparison, not just a crawler score.

Will you write developer tickets and QA fixes, or only audit?

How do you handle subdomains?

App, docs, help and blog.

What is your policy on AI crawlers?

Do they review CDN and WAF rules as well as robots.txt?

How do you prioritise?

Ask to see an example of a prioritised fix list.

What do you need from our engineers?

And how many hours a month?

Have you run a SaaS migration?

Ask what went wrong and how they recovered.

How will you report progress?

Indexation, rendering coverage and traffic to money pages, not 'errors fixed'.

Who does the work?

A senior technical SEO, or a junior running a tool?

Red flags: An audit that is mostly tool output; obsessing over a 100/100 Lighthouse score; recommending dynamic rendering by default (Google describes it as a workaround, not a long-term solution); 'crawl budget optimisation' for a small site; blanket blocking or allowing of AI bots without discussing the trade-offs; no questions about your release process.
Self-check

A technical SEO checklist you can run this week

If three or more of these turn up problems, a technical SEO engagement will likely pay for itself faster than more content.

  1. Open Search Console's Page indexing report and note the biggest 'not indexed' reasons.
  2. Use URL Inspection on your pricing page and a key feature page; compare the rendered HTML with what you expect.
  3. Search site:app.yourdomain.com and site:yourdomain.com inurl:login to find app and auth pages in the index.
  4. Open robots.txt on every subdomain.
  5. Check your CDN and security settings for AI-bot blocking toggles.
  6. Confirm your sitemaps list only live, canonical, indexable URLs.
  7. Check that deleted pages return a real 404 or 410, not a 200 'not found' page.
  8. Review the Core Web Vitals report for your top templates.
  9. Pick five blog posts and check whether they link to a product, pricing or comparison page.
  10. Run a few buyer prompts in ChatGPT and Perplexity and see whether your pages are ever cited.
FAQ

Technical SEO services FAQs

What do technical SEO services include?

A technical audit, crawl and indexation fixes, JavaScript rendering review, site architecture and internal linking, structured data, Core Web Vitals work on key templates, AI crawler access, migration support and ongoing monitoring, delivered as a prioritised fix list with developer-ready tickets.

How much do technical SEO services cost?

A one-off SaaS technical audit typically costs $2,500 to $10,000, and ongoing technical support roughly $1,500 to $5,000 a month. Migrations, replatforms and large international or multi-host projects are scoped separately. Technical SEO is also included in every Pipeline plan, from $3,500 a month.

Do I need a one-off audit or ongoing technical SEO?

An audit fits when you need a clear diagnosis and your developers can ship the fixes. Ongoing support fits SaaS teams that release often, run programmatic pages, have several subdomains or are planning a migration, because new problems arrive with every release.

Do you implement the fixes?

We make agreed SEO-level changes such as content, metadata, internal links and some schema. For application code, CDN configuration or deployment changes we write the tickets, review the proposed fix and QA the live release alongside your engineers.

If AI crawlers can reach my site, will ChatGPT cite me?

Not automatically. Access is the first requirement. Citations also depend on the page's clarity, relevance, authority, consistent brand information and evidence across the wider web. We remove the technical barriers and improve the conditions for citation; no one can guarantee an AI system will mention a brand.

Do we need to rebuild our JavaScript site for SEO?

Rarely. A framework is not a problem in itself. If the current stack can produce crawlable, indexable and fast pages, fixing the templates and release process is usually the better answer than replacing the technology.

Do schema and llms.txt get you cited by AI?

They are supporting infrastructure, not a citation strategy by themselves. We implement them where they improve machine understanding, then combine them with technical accessibility, useful content, authoritative mentions and citation tracking.

Find out what crawlers really see on your site

Book a technical review. We will check your key templates, your subdomains and your AI-crawler access, and tell you what to fix first.

Book a Technical Review

©2026 Top Search Agency. Founded 2024 in Islamabad, Pakistan. All rights reserved.

Scroll to Top